Phx Friends of UA SIRLS

News and info about librarianship, UA SIRLS, and libraries…

Librarian…It could be Worse–from LJ’s Annoyed Librarian

Posted by Editor on January 11, 2010

Last week the Wall Street Journal released a list of the 200 best and worst jobs for 2009, and Librarian made the list…in both categories! No, I’m kidding. There were no categories. It was a ranking, and Librarian ranked 46th. I didn’t think it would get so high.

The ranking was “based on five criteria — environment, income, employment outlook, physical demands and stress,” so I guess there’s some combination in there that makes Librarian better than Forklift Operator (67) and Optician (88). Actually, in those cases, it was probably the income, which is lower for opticians than for Librarians. Opticians don’t make much more money than Forklift Operators, which I didn’t know. In fact, I don’t think I know any opticians or forklift operators, but I don’t know a lot of people.

The pay was surprising on some. Librarians apparently make about the same as Hotel Managers (75), though managing a hotel seems like a lot more work to be than being a librarian. Teachers (116) are paid only slightly less than librarians, but obviously have worse jobs. I’m sure they have worse jobs than me, because spending all day in a room with irrational children would probably resemble being in a permanent management retreat.

Railroad Conductor (123) pays about the same as librarian as well, but I don’t know why it would be so poorly ranked. It’s probably more stressful. Where I Iive , if the train doesn’t run on time, there are a lot more irate people than if the library doesn’t run on time. And they probably don’t get to spend all day surfing the Internet reading blogs like librarians do.

I was surprised Highway Patrol Officers (175) make about the same as librarians, but not about the ranking. The pay doesn’t quite seem fair, since it’s virtually impossible for a librarian to get killed in the line of duty. Imagine the stress of wondering if every person walking up to the reference desk might shoot you. From what I read, the overtime and pension benefits are better, but still.

Dentists (97) make a lot more than librarians, but it seems clear to me why they’re ranked lower. I find it hard to imagine being happy in a job where I have to stick my fingers into some stranger’s mouth. Add in all the clown paintings around the office and it’s just too much. Surgeons rake in the dough, but I have a pretty good idea why they rank only 136. It’s sort of the opposite stress of highway patrolman, I’m sure. What if every time a cataloger messed up a call #, a patron died? I don’t know what makes catalogers so exacting, but it isn’t that.

In the top 30 are a number of occupations with which I’m very familiar – Biologist (4), Historian (5), Philosopher (11), Sociologist (21), Economist (26). No surprise there why they rank more highly than librarian. Though I was puzzled about Parole Officer (29) and  Medical Laboratory Technician (37). Could it really be that much better to be a parole officer? And how great could it be to be a Stenographer/Court Reporter (22)? And how could Bookkeeper (24) possibly be a better job than Astronomer (25), especially given the relative pay? Less night work, maybe.

It’s a truism that we envy those just above us in a hierarchy rather than those at the very top. The folks at the top are so distant we can never attain their greatness (unless, like the Annoyed Librarian, one actually is at the top, but obviously I’m an exception). Thus, we might think it’s hunky-dory to be a librarian at 46, but how much better it must be to be a Market Research Analyst (45)! This envy of those just above us must explain all the marketing language some librarians want to adopt. The difference is that market research analysts analyze market research, while librarians make posters and put announcements on their websites.

And if market research analyst is better, imagine the joys of being a Purchasing Agent (40)! What interesting work that must be, though it sounds an awful lot like Buyer (158). The title alone conjures up glorious images, though perhaps not as glorious as the next job, Insurance Underwriter (39)! Golly…..read entire post here: http://www.libraryjournal.com/blog/580000658/post/1000051900.html

Advertisements

2 Responses to “Librarian…It could be Worse–from LJ’s Annoyed Librarian”

  1. I believe a librarian is a good job that is worth having.

  2. jdondoyle said

    Me, too! Very worthwhile! Thanks for your comment! JDD

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: